This article is about different ways and methods of using situations to their utmost capacity. Theories of change are events that are likely to happen or can happen with the benefit of hindsight. However, no matter how situations are adopted, for the future or as hindsight, in either case, time and sincere efforts are needed from top management and adherents, as honest reports regarding change rules and techniques are not made available or understood by self-analysis.
It is absolutely necessary to involve neutral sources who can help clarify these theories by noticing things that would not be noticed by those who are using scenarios. Illustrative presentations with descriptions in black and white will help to clarify the relationship between different types of scenarios.
Discussions can draw out theories of change including the unambiguous and absolute reason for outside involvement for designing and implementing the required changes. This would include the specific issues to be taken care of, give a better understanding of outside intervening objectives, be sure that the procedures that they are implementing will bring about the desired change, and outline short and long terms benefits of implementing the recommended changes.
After the preliminary outlining, organizers should concentrate on advisory queries for expounding indistinct expressions, links, and the absence of consistency, including discovering the logic that program executives take regarding conclusions about how changes take place.