In print media this is one of the major issues and credibility is questioned in a number of instances. A writer can easily manipulate figures and can easily draw readers into thinking that the results are very high or extremely low in some cases. In an article, Pregnancy (Biggest threat to women) the writer uses statistical approach to give estimation that 585,500 become pregnant every year. The reader actually knows the approximation but not the exact amount. The reader believes that this approximated figure is the real figure and it’s very high (Alterman, 2004). Similarly, in the cases of bomb blast and natural calamities writers that are associated with the print media create hype about the figures and they actually don’t portray the real figures. This type of biasness is usually found in the print media and it is used to add more spice in the article.
Omission in the news is also considered to be a source of biasness and it’s often treated as one of the strongest types of biasness. The writer easily leaves out facts and figures which might be important for the readers. Therefore, by this approach a reader attains a state of confusion and very rarely the writer gets both the good and the worst side of an incident.
On October 7, 1999 the Globe and Mail demonstrates a biased attitude in their article when the depicted facts about alcohol usage and how it helps to repair liver damage but they doesn’t highlighted the negative effects of alcohol (Kincaid, Aronoff, & Irvine, 2007). This elimination might be counterproductive for many individuals and can seriously damage them. Print media mostly uses this approach and they either increase certain figures or eliminate them. In this way media is depicting its negative image in the society.
Kindly order term papers, essays, research papers, dissertations, thesis, book reports from the order page.